The Most Active and Friendliest
Affiliate Marketing Community Online!

“AdsEmpire”/  Direct Affiliate

Ask Me Anything AI Traffic Analysis

Graybeard

Well-Known Member
this is my traffic data
email-traffic-sample.png

***Worthy to note here; this is redirected image click email sourced traffic and not clicked email text link traffic
popunderTraffic.png


Anthropic Claude Opus 3 `got it` better than ChatGPT4

This cuts to the chase. This process was completed in 2 minutes at most of AI time.
Most of my time cost was human formatting this board post :(

2 AI bots that cost me $40 month replace so much of my time it's ridiculous.
However it is worthy to say that my drilling down and analysis of the details and the particulars and attributes is a discovery process that I have not yet been able to prompt AI to do.

***the conversion rate was wrong I had to remove it from this table in an edit.

Metric​
Email Traffic​
Popunder Traffic​
Normalized Email Traffic (per $50)​
Normalized Popunder Traffic (per $224)​
Comments​
Cost​
$50​
$224​
$50​
$224​
The cost of email traffic is $50, while the cost of
popunder traffic is $224.​
Average engagement time​
1m 08s​
6s​
1m 08s​
1.34s​
After normalization, email traffic still shows
significantly higher engagement time compared
to popunder traffic.​
Engaged sessions​
118​
3783​
118​
843.08​
Normalized engaged sessions are much higher
for popunder traffic due to the higher cost, but
email traffic remains more engaged relative to its cost.​
Events per session​
6.38​
0.18​
6.38​
0.04​
Normalized events per session remain significantly
higher for email traffic, indicating better engagement and
interaction relative to the cost.​
Conversions​
1052​
3​
1052​
0.67​
Normalized conversions are substantially higher
for email traffic, suggesting it is more
cost-effective for driving conversions.​
Avg events per session​
1​
1.05​
1​
0.23​
Normalized average events per session are
higher for email traffic, suggesting more
meaningful engagement relative to the cost.​
Avg sessions per user​
1.29​
1​
1.29​
0.22​
Normalized average sessions per user remain
higher for email traffic, indicating better visitor
retention and loyalty relative to the cost.​
% of new sessions​
89.83%​
99.97%​
89.83%​
22.31%​
The normalized percentage of new sessions is
higher for email traffic, suggesting it attracts more
new visitors relative to the cost compared to
popunder traffic.​
 
Last edited:
The following needs to be noted:
  1. The conversion `events` were under reported by me for the pops --the GA4 was not set up altogether correctly
  2. the pops resulted in 4 freemium conversions and 1 credit card verified conversion (1*$50)+(3*$5) $65 estimated value --this is a rev-share deal --lost my ass :(
  3. the email `redirects` resulted in 2 freemium conversions or $10 estimated value --this is a rev-share deal --lost my ass :( but LESS
 
My true engagement rates:
Engaged session/Traffic network (or source) count

popunders;


; 3783/125000
0.030264

email image redirects:
; 118/250
0.472

e-mails are about 15.6 x better
; 0.472 / 0.030264
~15.59608776103621464446
corrected counts**
 
banners
Back