Guys,
I have a health site (self designed- with sitemaker & self seo - therefore both not excellent).
Now, what i dont understand is this - my site - eDoctor - is on google dot com and google dot co dot uk - as number 1 for edoctor - not much of competition - but what i dont understand is how come my site having iffy backlinks ( some 400 odd) & regional domain ( i.e India) ranks better than a TLD i.e biz and net with 27,000 backlinks for the .biz web site - with edoctor as the anchor text & older domain etc. I know PR doesn't affect serp's.
see the search here
Is it just the title tag or is it something very obvious that i can't see.
Ok, i have excellent content - most of it is self written - BUT - acc. to page rank algorithm - it is back links which are the major factor.
Am i wrong?
Can someone explain!
it is just that, it is baffling me for some time & i thought that i might bite the bullet and ask here!
Thanks in advance!
Abhishek Arora
I have a health site (self designed- with sitemaker & self seo - therefore both not excellent).
Now, what i dont understand is this - my site - eDoctor - is on google dot com and google dot co dot uk - as number 1 for edoctor - not much of competition - but what i dont understand is how come my site having iffy backlinks ( some 400 odd) & regional domain ( i.e India) ranks better than a TLD i.e biz and net with 27,000 backlinks for the .biz web site - with edoctor as the anchor text & older domain etc. I know PR doesn't affect serp's.
see the search here
Is it just the title tag or is it something very obvious that i can't see.
Ok, i have excellent content - most of it is self written - BUT - acc. to page rank algorithm - it is back links which are the major factor.
Am i wrong?
Can someone explain!
it is just that, it is baffling me for some time & i thought that i might bite the bullet and ask here!
Thanks in advance!
Abhishek Arora