A WebmasterWorld thread discusses a great case study which should be shared with as many webmasters as possible to warn them against the screwed start. Here?s what it is about:
A guy decides to create a network of 100 sites following ALL Google guidelines;
Each site has only one page and almost no content;
The sites are NOT interlinked (as this is against Google rules);
Each site targets tiny keyword all in the same niche;
All the sites are on the same host and C-class IP;
All the sites are verified with the same Google Webmaster Tools account;
Some of the sites run Amazon ads;
The guy thinks he doesn?t break any rules and plans to moderately grow each site after all 100 one-page sites have been launched.
A day comes (after 6 months of huge work) when he finds all his 100 sites penalized?
Welcome to Our Community
Wanting to join the rest of our members? Feel free to sign up today.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Attention: "role based name" email prefixes such as support, webmaster, info, contact, forum, service, affiliate, admin, traffic, partners, marketing, etc., for our member accounts are not permitted. They are acceptable for a vendor listing, but not for the member email. This is due to bulk email processors scrubbing them for delivery due to extremely high bounce rates. Please apply for membership using a personalized email prefix. Something like bob@xxxxx.com.
If we discover you signed up with a role based name we will give you only one message to change it. After 3 days your account will be removed if the email is not changed.
