Graybeard
Well-Known Member
The US GEO is not what you may think it is
The wealth index is my own algorithm; the algorithm includes income and the relationship of that state's cost of living aggregated to that state's population.
True, there are pockets of prosperity and pockets of poverty in each state. However, the disparity varies by geography.
See MD (Maryland) near the top? Well, it ain't Baltimore -- it's the part near Washington D.C. where the slime that lives off the Federal government lives The lobbyists other leaches
Interestingly, the algorithm includes New Hampshire and Iowa as very median states and these states host the earliest presidential election primaries. New Hampshire and Iowa are considered bell weather states for the popular vote. So, any doubts of the validity of this algorithm are addressed in real application.
If you look at the indexing you can see the wide variance.
The wealth index is my own algorithm; the algorithm includes income and the relationship of that state's cost of living aggregated to that state's population.
True, there are pockets of prosperity and pockets of poverty in each state. However, the disparity varies by geography.
See MD (Maryland) near the top? Well, it ain't Baltimore -- it's the part near Washington D.C. where the slime that lives off the Federal government lives The lobbyists other leaches
Interestingly, the algorithm includes New Hampshire and Iowa as very median states and these states host the earliest presidential election primaries. New Hampshire and Iowa are considered bell weather states for the popular vote. So, any doubts of the validity of this algorithm are addressed in real application.
If you look at the indexing you can see the wide variance.
- Do you think the US GEO traffic is all worth the same price
- If all the traffic in Europe, as an example, was the same price would you think that a fair deal?
- Would you pay the same for Germany as you would for some second tier European country?