Graybeard
Well-Known Member
A US 9th District Court ruled that it is legal to scrape data available to the public; in this case Twitter's (X's) content.
>>>``U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco ruled on Thursday that X, formerly Twitter, failed to plausibly allege that Bright Data Ltd violated its user agreement by allowing the scraping and evading X's own anti-scraping technology.
Alsup said using scraping tools is not inherently fraudulent, and giving social media companies free rein to decide how public data are used "risks the possible creation of information monopolies that would disserve the public interest."
The judge also said X was not entitled to "de facto copyright ownership" in copyrighted content that X's users made available to the public.
Lawyers for X did not immediately respond on Friday to requests for comment.
Or Lenchner, Bright Data's chief executive, said in a statement: "Bright Data's victory over X makes it clear to the world that public information on the web belongs to all of us, and any attempt to deny the public access will fail." ``<<<
I engage Claude AI robo-brain and ask of it:
Me: Both of these rulings came from the same US Court District. Speculate as to the precedent of the LinkedIn case applies to this case in the court's judgements in Bright Data's favor
This is an AI opinion and not an opinion of a licensed Attorney at Law -- use with caution --you have been warned!
>>>``U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco ruled on Thursday that X, formerly Twitter, failed to plausibly allege that Bright Data Ltd violated its user agreement by allowing the scraping and evading X's own anti-scraping technology.
Alsup said using scraping tools is not inherently fraudulent, and giving social media companies free rein to decide how public data are used "risks the possible creation of information monopolies that would disserve the public interest."
The judge also said X was not entitled to "de facto copyright ownership" in copyrighted content that X's users made available to the public.
Lawyers for X did not immediately respond on Friday to requests for comment.
Or Lenchner, Bright Data's chief executive, said in a statement: "Bright Data's victory over X makes it clear to the world that public information on the web belongs to all of us, and any attempt to deny the public access will fail." ``<<<
I engage Claude AI robo-brain and ask of it:
Me: Both of these rulings came from the same US Court District. Speculate as to the precedent of the LinkedIn case applies to this case in the court's judgements in Bright Data's favor
This is an AI opinion and not an opinion of a licensed Attorney at Law -- use with caution --you have been warned!
Last edited: