The Most Active and Friendliest
Affiliate Marketing Community Online!

“Adavice”/  “CPA

Will ChatGPT AI replace Google?

Graybeard

Well-Known Member


AI ️
There is no doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and growing more sophisticated every day. With the rapid expansion of AI capabilities, there is a growing concern that AI will eventually replace humans in many jobs and tasks. While it is true that AI is capable of completing many tasks more efficiently than humans, there are many reasons why AI will never completely replace humans.

First, AI is built on the premise of completing specific tasks more efficiently than humans. However, AI is not capable of generalizing like humans. For example, a computer program can quickly calculate the square root of any number, but it cannot have a conversation or understand a joke like a human can. In order for AI to replace humans in tasks, it would need to be able to duplicate all of human cognitive abilities, which is not possible.

Second, even if AI could replace humans in specific tasks, there are many jobs that require human interaction and emotions that AI cannot provide. For example, jobs like teaching, nursing, and therapy all require human interaction and emotions. These types of jobs cannot be replaced by AI.

Third, humans have an inherent need for social interaction. Even if AI could provide all the same services as humans, humans would still prefer to interact with other humans. This need for social interaction is what keeps many jobs safe from AI replacement.

Fourth, humans are constantly changing and evolving. As our needs and wants change, so do the types of jobs we have. For example, there are now jobs in the cannabis industry that didn't exist 10 years ago. And as technology advances, new types of jobs will continue to be created. So even if robots do eventually take over many of the jobs currently being done by humans, that doesn't mean there will be mass unemployment. There will just be a shift in the types of jobs available.

My AI ^ seems to want to reassure the 'victims'
 
input-seed

seed (text from a business modeling college lecture):
The ability to model and perform decision modeling and analysis is an essential feature of many real-world applications ranging from emergency medical treatment in intensive care units to military command and control systems.

(ChatGPT would choke and lock-up on this (I think) TMI :D)

AI discussion (unedited):

However, many decision models are intractable, meaning that they cannot be solved to optimality by traditional methods. Therefore, approximation algorithms are used to find suboptimal solutions. Approximation algorithms are a type of heuristic, which is a rule of thumb that is not guaranteed to find the best solution, but is often good enough.

When choosing an approximation algorithm, there are three main considerations: the quality of the solution, the speed of the algorithm, and the amount of resources required. The quality of the solution is measured by the optimality gap, which is the difference between the value of the solution found by the algorithm and the value of the optimal solution. The speed of the algorithm is measured by the running time, which is the number of operations required to find the solution. The amount of resources required is measured by the space complexity, which is the amount of memory required to store the data used by the algorithm.

There are many different approximation algorithms, and the best one to use depends on the specific problem. For example, the greedy algorithm is often used for problems in which the goal is to find the best solution that can be found in a reasonable amount of time. The algorithm works by making the locally optimal choice at each step, without considering the long-term consequences. This can lead to sub-optimal solutions, but it is often good enough.

The greedy algorithm is not the only option, and there are many other approximation algorithms that can be more accurate and efficient for some classes of problems.
One such algorithm is the semi-definite programming (SDP) approximation algorithm, which has been shown to be more accurate than the greedy algorithm for some problems.
Furthermore, the SDP algorithm can be used to approximate the MAX-SAT problem, and so it can be used to find solutions to problems that are not possible to solve using the greedy algorithm.In conclusion, the SDP algorithm is a more powerful and accurate approximation algorithm than the greedy algorithm, and it should be used when more accuracy is required.

MAX-SAT problem

 

AI image generation tech can now create life-wrecking deepfakes with ease​

joe_training_images_set.jpg




all-your-base-yoda.jpeg
 
However, ChatAI is a very creative lair --ChatAI my have a future in Politics :p

">>>"I deliberately asked it about something that I thought that I know doesn't exist so that they can judge whether it actually also has the notion of what exists and what doesn't exist," she said.

ChatGPT produced an answer so specific and plausible sounding, backed with citations, she said, that she had to investigate whether the fake phenomenon, "a cycloidal inverted electromagnon," was actually real.

When she looked closer, the alleged source material was also bogus, she said. There were names of well-known physics experts listed – the titles of the publications they supposedly authored, however, were non-existent, she said.

"This is where it becomes kind of dangerous," Kubacka said. "The moment that you cannot trust the references, it also kind of erodes the trust in citing science whatsoever," she said.

Scientists call these fake generations "hallucinations." <<<"

 
+
AI ️
There is no doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving and growing more sophisticated every day. With the rapid expansion of AI capabilities, there is a growing concern that AI will eventually replace humans in many jobs and tasks. While it is true that AI is capable of completing many tasks more efficiently than humans, there are many reasons why AI will never completely replace humans.

First, AI is built on the premise of completing specific tasks more efficiently than humans. However, AI is not capable of generalizing like humans. For example, a computer program can quickly calculate the square root of any number, but it cannot have a conversation or understand a joke like a human can. In order for AI to replace humans in tasks, it would need to be able to duplicate all of human cognitive abilities, which is not possible.

Second, even if AI could replace humans in specific tasks, there are many jobs that require human interaction and emotions that AI cannot provide. For example, jobs like teaching, nursing, and therapy all require human interaction and emotions. These types of jobs cannot be replaced by AI.

Third, humans have an inherent need for social interaction. Even if AI could provide all the same services as humans, humans would still prefer to interact with other humans. This need for social interaction is what keeps many jobs safe from AI replacement.

Fourth, humans are constantly changing and evolving. As our needs and wants change, so do the types of jobs we have. For example, there are now jobs in the cannabis industry that didn't exist 10 years ago. And as technology advances, new types of jobs will continue to be created. So even if robots do eventually take over many of the jobs currently being done by humans, that doesn't mean there will be mass unemployment. There will just be a shift in the types of jobs available.

My AI ^ seems to want to reassure the 'victims'
I doubt it, Google been around for too long and has way too much buying power and resources, its possible but doubt it
 
Flush with cash and ready to try to do battle again :D

>>>
Jan 3 (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) is in the works to launch a version of its search engine Bing using the artificial intelligence behind OpenAI-launched chatbot ChatGPT, The Information reported on Tuesday, citing two people with direct knowledge of the plans.

Microsoft could launch the new feature before the end of March, and hopes to challenge Alphabet-owned search engine Google (GOOGL.O),the San Francisco-based technology news website said in a report. <<<


The problem with being Number 1 is everyone wants to clobber you ...
 
Hmm, I don't even see any way to make that happen. In fact, even if it is used very often, manual labor will be even more valuable than before. In addition, I think they will be able to recognize AI work, thereby marking such content or imposing penalties
 
It is unlikely that ChatGPT AI will replace Google in the near future. While ChatGPT AI is a powerful language model capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions, it is not a search engine in the same way that Google is.

Google's search engine uses complex algorithms and artificial intelligence to crawl and index websites, analyze content, and provide users with relevant search results based on their queries. This is a much more complex task than simply generating human-like responses to specific questions.
 
MI
Back